Philip I

Founded 27-Jul-2003
Last update 30-Mar-2015

Silver coins References



Identification Number PH1-AR-01

Mint: uncertain mint in Cilicia, probably Tarsos1
Period: 94/3 - perhaps 88/7 BC
Denomination: AR Tetradrachm
Detail
Weight: 16.09 g
Diameter: 26 - 27 mm
Obverse: Diademed head of Philip I right; fillet border
Reverse: ‘[Β]ΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΦΙΛΙΠΠΟΥ’ right, ‘ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ [Φ]ΙΛΑΔΕΛΦΟ[Υ]’ left (“of King Philip, the Illustrious, Brother-Loving”); Zeus Nikephoros (“carrying victory”) seated left on throne, holding Nike in outstretched right hand and scepter in left hand; ‘Ν’ above ‘Α’ in outer left field; ‘ΑΡ’ ligature in inner left field; ‘ΔΙ’ monogram under throne; all within partially visible laurel wreath
Die axis:
References: Houghton, Lorber and Hoover, SC II, 2460d; Houghton, CSE, 393 (same obverse die); Newell, SMA, 436 var. (no control mark in inner left field)

 

 

Identification Number PH1-AR-02

Mint: uncertain North Syrian or Cilician mint
Period: c. 95/4 - perhaps 76/5 BC
Denomination: AR Tetradrachm
Detail
Weight: 15.06 g
Diameter: 25 - 26 mm
Obverse: Diademed head of Philip I right; fillet border
Reverse: ‘ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩ[Σ] ΦΙΛΙΠΠΟΥ’ right, ‘ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΑΔΕΛΦΟ[Υ]’ left (“of King Philip, the Illustrious, Brother-Loving”); Zeus Nikephoros (“carrying victory”) seated left on throne, holding Nike in outstretched right hand and scepter in left hand; ‘Ν’ (?) in outer left field; ‘ΔΙ’ monogram under throne; all within partially visible laurel wreath
Die axis:
References: Houghton, Lorber and Hoover, SC II, –
Note: This coin probably comes from a North Syrian or Cilician mint, but the mint is not possible to determine at present. It can be a lifetime issue, but it is also possible that it is an ancient imitative issue or a posthumous issue. In any case, the style and the lack of monograms in the left field almost guarantees that it is not a Roman re-issue of Philip I.2

 

 

Identification Number PH1-AR-03

Mint: uncertain mint
Period: c. 93 - 83 BC
Denomination: AR Tetradrachm
Detail
Weight: 14.98 g
Diameter: 24 - 25 mm
Obverse: Diademed head of Philip I right; fillet border
Reverse: ‘[ΒΑΣ]ΙΛΕΩ[Σ] [Φ]ΙΛΙΠΠΟΥ’ right, ‘ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ [ΦΙ]ΛΑΔΕΛΦΟ[Υ]’ left (“of King Philip, the Illustrious, Brother-Loving”); Zeus Nikephoros (“carrying victory”) seated left on throne, holding Nike in outstretched right hand and scepter in left hand; ‘Ι’ (?) under throne; pellet in Nike’s wreath; all within partially visible laurel wreath
Die axis: c. 30º
References: Houghton, Lorber and Hoover, SC II, –
Note:

Some Seleukid didrachms, tetradrachms and gold octadrachms minted at Antioch and Ake-Ptolemais bear marks in the form of pellets. Similar pellets can be also found on some early silver and bronze coins of Roman Antioch, on Macedonian tetradrachms struck under the Roman quaestor Aesillas (c. 69 - 67 BC), and on staters of the later kings of the Cimmerian Bosporus (c. AD 154/166 - 234/5). See Houghton, Lorber and Hoover, SC II, Vol. 2, pp. 231-235 for a study devoted to this phenomenon.

Seleukid coins with pellets are rare. Known specimens were struck under Demetrios I, Alexander I, Antiochos VI, Tryphon, Antiochos VII, Demetrios II (2nd reign), Kleopatra Thea and Antiochos VIII, Antiochos VIII, Antiochos IX, Antiochos X and Antiochos XIII (ibid, pp. 233-234). Philip I’s coin presented above is probably the first published coin of this king with the pellet.

The purpose of these marks is not known. It is possible that, in some cases, the pellets were used as marks of major design elements to ensure a reproduction of near identical types from die to die. Thus, they might be artefacts of the die engraving process that would normally be obscured by the finished type or otherwise erased, but which sometimes survived into the coin striking process. However, it is also possible that they served as a form of control marks. There is also a hypothesis that they were used by some engravers to differentiate their works from others. See ibid, pp. 231-233, for a detailed discussion.

 

 


1 The most important city of ancient Cilicia. Located near the Mediterranean Sea coast on the Tarsus river (ancient Kydnos), present-day Mersin Province, Turkey.

Strabo, Geography, 14.5.12-15: As for Tarsus, it lies in a plain; and it was founded by the Argives who wandered with Triptolemus in quest of Io; and it is intersected in the middle by the Cydnus River, which flows past the very gymnasium of the young men. Now inasmuch as the source of the river is not very far away and its stream passes through a deep ravine and then empties immediately into the city, its discharge is both cold and swift; and hence it is helpful both to men and to cattle that are suffering from swollen sinews, if they immerse themselves in its waters.

The people at Tarsus have devoted themselves so eagerly, not only to philosophy, but also to the whole round of education in general, that they have surpassed Athens, Alexandria, or any other place that can be named where there have been schools and lectures of philosophers. But it is so different from other cities that there the men who are fond of learning, are all natives, and foreigners are not inclined to sojourn there; neither do these natives stay there, but they complete their education abroad; and when they have completed it they are pleased to live abroad, and but few go back home. ... Further, the city of Tarsus has all kinds of schools of rhetoric; and in general it not only has a flourishing population but also is most powerful, thus keeping up the reputation of the mother-city.

The following men were natives of Tarsus: among the Stoics, Antipater and Archedemus and Nestor; and also the two Athenodoruses, one of whom, called Cordylion, lived with Marcus Cato and died at his house; and the other, the son of Sandon, called Cananites after some village, was Caesar’s teacher and was greatly honored by him; ...

Among the other philosophers from Tarsus, “whom I could well note and tell their names,” (Homer, Illiad iii.235) are Plutiades and Diogenes, who were among those philosophers that went round from city to city and conducted schools in an able manner. Diogenes also composed poems, as if by inspiration, when a subject was given him – for the most part tragic poems; and as for grammarians whose writings are extant, there are Artemidorus and Diodorus; and the best tragic poet among those enumerated in the “Pleias” was Dionysides. But it is Rome that is best able to tell us the number of learned men from this city; for it is full of Tarsians and Alexandrians. Such is Tarsus.


2 Thanks to Oliver D. Hoover for his kind help with the attribution.


References:

Houghton, Arthur:Coins of the Seleucid Empire from the Collection of Arthur Houghton. The American Numismatic Society, New York, 1983. (abbr. CSE)
Houghton, Arthur; Lorber, Catharine; Hoover, Oliver:Seleucid Coins, A Comprehensive Catalogue. Part II, Volumes 1 and 2. The American Numismatic Society, New York, in association with Classical Numismatic Group, Inc., Lancaster/London, 2008. (abbr. SC II)
Newell, Edward T.:The Seleucid Mint of Antioch. Chicago, 1978 (Obol International reprint of the 1918 original). (abbr. SMA)
Strabo:Geography. Translated and ed. by H. C. Hamilton and W. Falconer. William Heinemann, Ltd., London, 1924. (The Perseus Digital Library, http://www.perseus.org/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=Strab.+toc)